Negotiations Turned Humiliating for the State

The article focuses on the Lebanese negotiations with Israel and opposes Hezbollah's rhetoric, which depicts the negotiations as betrayal and a surrender of rights. It clarifies that failing to reach an agreement so far does not mean Lebanon is relinquishing its rights; rather, the Lebanese negotiator is keen on protecting national interests and regaining occupied territories. The article emphasizes that negotiation is a means to achieve these goals, not an act of surrender. It also asserts that portraying the state and delegating its decision-making on war and peace is a sovereign right. Attempts to delegitimize the negotiator and the president undermine the legitimacy of the state and hinder political solutions, while restoring the authority over war and peace is fundamental to national sovereignty. The piece points out that denying the state's capacity and legitimacy hampers efforts to recover national rights and exposes Lebanon to greater risks.

articleDetails.fontSize.sizeحجم النص

تنويه: هذا ملخص تم إنشاؤه بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

عرض المقال بالكامل