Imam Musa al-Sadr's Disappearance and Impact

The article discusses the absence of Imam Musa al-Sadr and its impact on the concept of resistance in Lebanon. It considers that his disappearance was not limited to his person alone but also affected the systems and understanding of resistance itself. Especially as resistance shifted from being a means to liberate South Lebanon from Israeli occupation to becoming a tool serving an regional project linked to Iran's axis. The article clarifies that Musa al-Sadr emphasized that weapons were an exception, not a substitute for the state, and that resistance should serve to protect the homeland and restore its sovereignty, rather than being an independent goal. It points out that his absence led to a deviation in the resistance project and deepened Iranian influence in Lebanon, with the South turning into a battleground for regional conflicts. This resulted in the destruction of the country and the displacement of hundreds of thousands, with a resistance incapable of safeguarding sovereignty, turning the South into a matter of external calculations at the expense of national sovereignty and identity. The article concludes by stressing the importance of restoring Lebanon’s primary goal and sovereignty, asserting that resistance should support the state rather than oppose it. It highlights that the absence of Musa al-Sadr has a strategic dimension, and its significance lies in raising the question of who currently holds the decision over the South.

articleDetails.fontSize.sizeحجم النص

تنويه: هذا ملخص تم إنشاؤه بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

عرض المقال بالكامل