Gebran Bassil on historical judgment

The understanding established between Hezbollah and the Lebanese government twenty years ago is considered an attempt to protect Lebanon from divisions and internal conflicts by building a balanced relationship between the resistance and the state. It emphasizes the necessity for the resistance to be an integral part of the state, with weapons maintained within a national defensive strategy and under the state's authority, aiming to prevent slipping into a civil war or marginalizing Lebanese sovereignty. The article finds that some components of the resistance believe that weapons are the primary guarantee for facing threats from Israel, whereas it argues that Lebanon’s true guarantee lies in its state institutions. Losing these institutions would mean the disappearance of the resistance and the collapse of the safe region. The author warns of the dangers of weapons becoming a factor of dominance or a threat to citizens, stressing that building the state and national partnership is the way to preserve Lebanon and its stability. The country's interest requires putting an end to unilateral weapon usage and restoring full sovereignty to the state.

articleDetails.fontSize.sizeحجم النص

تنويه: هذا ملخص تم إنشاؤه بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

عرض المقال بالكامل