23 Hrs
Source:
USA TODAY
Penn & Teller critique death penalty case
Penn & Teller have filed a legal brief supporting a Texas man facing execution, arguing that investigative hypnosis used to identify him constituted junk science and possibly misconduct. The case involves whether the Supreme Court should reconsider his conviction, which was based on a witness’s testimony potentially influenced by hypnosis. Despite claims of new scientific consensus and previous denials of appeals, the court's decision on hearing the case could come as early as June 15.
Size: 120%Text Size
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)