بوابة الشروق
Source: بوابة الشروق
24 Hrsبوابة الشروق
Source: بوابة الشروق
24 HrsReady to play
Ready to play
The article discusses the five largest countries in the world that do not maintain standing armies, analyzing the reasons behind this situation, such as reliance on security alliances and economic resources. It focuses on the details of each country: - **Iceland**: Has not had an army since 1869, relying instead on its relations with NATO and a defense agreement with the United States. It holds strategic importance due to its geographic location above the Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom gap. - **Solomon Islands**: Have never possessed an army since gaining independence in 1978, instead depending on allies like the United States, Britain, and Australia for protection. There is also a security agreement with Beijing, which fuels regional competition. - **Mauritius**: Decided not to establish an army after independence in 1968, relying on a partnership with India for defense. The country also seeks to reclaim the Chagos Islands from Britain. - **Panama**: Gained independence in 1903; it previously had an army, but it was abolished in 1994. Panama depends on international treaties to protect the Panama Canal and retains the right for US military intervention if necessary. - **Costa Rica**: Disbanded its army after a civil war in 1948 and has since focused on social and environmental development. It relies on the Rio Treaty, which guarantees collective assistance in the event of an attack, and maintains good relations with neighboring countries. The study shows that most of these small nations depend on international partnerships and treaties to ensure their security, although some larger countries also rely on geopolitical shields and alliances.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)