Former Lebanese dean tells Arabi21 that negotiations with the occupation did not lead to a ceasefire or withdrawal
The article discusses the efforts of indirect negotiations between Lebanon and the Israeli occupation, under American sponsorship. The two delegations are focused on implementing the framework agreement, which includes the redeployment of occupying forces and their withdrawal from certain areas in exchange for the Lebanese army's deployment and the dismantling of Hezbollah's military structures. The report highlights that the occupation seeks to impose arrangements covering non-occupied areas, aiming to solidify its security presence. Meanwhile, Lebanon insists that Israeli withdrawal must precede the deployment of the Lebanese army, with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun rejecting these proposals. The article also examines the risks associated with the occupation's attempt to disarm Hezbollah and how internal Lebanese divisions impact the negotiation process, emphasizing that the core of the crisis lies in the ongoing occupation and refusal to relinquish it—not merely in the details of testing zones or implementation mechanisms. Analyses indicate that the United States has tried to pressure the occupation to prevent expanding hostilities, while experts warn that Israel considers the designated safe zones as part of an enduring security system aimed at strengthening its control, despite no final results being achieved so far.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)