Qleimos: Agreement is not legislation
The legal article discusses the opinion of expert and lawyer Michel Qleimos regarding the legitimacy of the framework agreement between Lebanon and Israel. He affirms that the negotiations were conducted with constitutional cover from the Council of Ministers and that the agreement aligns with Lebanon’s international obligations, particularly the 1949 Armistice Agreement and the Arab Peace Initiative. He emphasizes that the agreement does not constitute legislation for the occupation but rather regulates Israeli withdrawal operations, which should be accompanied by enforcement guarantees from the Security Council or the United States to ensure Israel’s complete withdrawal and the protection of Lebanese sovereignty. Additionally, he clarifies that the agreement reflects Lebanon’s commitment to international and legal initiatives, and it should be paired with policies to guarantee weapons exclusivity and the sovereignty of the state.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)