Great Lebanon reaffirmed
The article by Fadi Kiroz explores the reality of the Great Lebanon as a product of a specific political and geographical history. Its borders were defined based on an agreement with France in 1920, which was rooted in the division of Mount Hermon between Lebanon and Syria. The author argues that the true mistake was not in the creation of Greater Lebanon itself, but in adopting the 1926 constitution, which established a centralist system within a pluralistic state. This led to political instability, wars, massacres, and a demographic decline among Christians. He believes that Greater Lebanon was, in fact, a return to a historical truth, but the sin was in the formulation of the 1926 constitution, whose effects continue to influence Lebanon to this day.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)