Ready to play
Ready to play
The article highlights the controversy surrounding the attempt to revive the rule of the three presidents in Lebanon, considering this move as an effort to establish a parallel authority outside the framework of the constitution and describing it as a subtle coup against the Taif Agreement. It clarifies that the Lebanese constitution assigns clear powers to the President, the government, and the Parliament, and that activating a triad of the three presidents goes beyond the constitutional scope and threatens the balance of institutional powers. The text also emphasizes that solutions should be pursued within the framework of constitutional institutions and that adherence to consensus among these institutions is the true guarantee of system stability. Additionally, it refutes claims of sectarian balance that undermine the concept of the state and weaken Lebanese democracy.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)