Support and opposition in (4+4) committee outcomes
The article analyzed the outputs of the (4+4) Committee, which the UN Support Mission in Libya expressed support for, clarifying the factors supporting and opposing it. It explained that its proponents, who control the ground, favor it because it enhances their authority, provides them with the opportunity to remain in their positions until 2028, helps unify institutions, and contributes to resolving issues related to military candidacies and dual nationality. Conversely, some oppose it because it disregards the permanent constitution, delays the election process in an uncertain manner, entrenches the transitional phase, and allows for its extension, thereby increasing the suffering of the Libyan people and threatening national sovereignty—especially concerning the presidential powers and the candidacy of military personnel and dual nationals. The article suggested amending key points such as ensuring the independence of the High Electoral Commission, holding legislative and presidential elections on time, prioritizing a referendum on the constitution, and establishing strict guarantees for presidential candidates—particularly regarding dual nationalities. It emphasized that the best solution lies in national consensus through concessions and confidence in electoral ballots to ensure stability and sovereignty of the state.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)