24 Hrs
Source:
الصحيفة
_1777011671128_85597701.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Law 19.25 and animal rights
The article discusses critiques of the Moroccan Law 19.25 related to the protection of stray animals, focusing on its balance between safeguarding animals from risks (such as rabies and uncontrolled reproduction) and their fundamental rights. It highlights that the law emphasizes controlling animals due to potential dangers, which threatens the underlying philosophy of protection. The article emphasizes that danger is not an inherent trait of animals and that the concept of fundamental rights should be limited to protecting animals from suffering, such as torture and starvation, rather than equating them with humans. It also underscores that protecting humans from animal-related risks should not come at the expense of animal rights, stressing the importance of using less harmful means to achieve goals, and the necessity of assessing interventions based on necessity and proportionality. Finally, it warns that the implementation of the law might shift towards focusing on reducing animal numbers through confinement rather than addressing the root causes of stray animals and true risks. The article affirms that true success lies in reducing risks and suffering without excluding animals, while responsibly returning animals that can be reintroduced into their natural environment.
Size: 120%Text Size
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)