_1777011671128_85597701.png&w=64&q=75){kind=small}
Majestic mansion hosts feast amid elections
The article discusses the phenomenon of using banquets and election parties, especially organizing large feasts such as 262 Qasriyya dishes of mashed meat, as a means to enhance candidates' presence and create a relationship based on personal benefit rather than political programs and agendas. The text clarifies that focusing on these appearances in election campaigns can undermine the concept of democracy, as voters in such cases are treated as material beneficiaries rather than as citizens capable of evaluating and holding candidates accountable for their true performance in Parliament. The article emphasizes that elections should be based on achievements and programs, not on the size of banquets and services offered, because a free vote remains linked to political stance and accomplishments, not to superficial displays or personal gain. It underscores that turning the electoral campaign into a stage for banquets and photos threatens the development of the democratic process and reproduces its old forms based on interests rather than accountability for positions.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)