Ready to play
Ready to play
The First Instance and Court of Appeal both ruled to dismiss the plaintiff's lawsuit regarding the prohibition of travel without a judicial order, within just a month and a half. Later, after a year had passed since the case was filed, the Court of Cassation (Supreme Court) decided that the jurisdiction over a compensation claim for damages resulting from travel bans rests with the civil courts, based on tort liability, since the request is independent of the annulment of any administrative decision. This decision by the Court of Cassation is significant because it opens the door for those harmed by illegal travel bans or bans not based on an official judicial order to file lawsuits seeking compensation.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)