Are the gatherings composed of Companions and good news
The article addressed the criticisms related to the formation of national and administrative councils, especially those that include members who are companions, early promisers, or individuals without relevant expertise. The writer confirmed that objections often come from those not involved in the councils, and that some members are appointed based on their connections or personal interests rather than professional standards or transparency. He also pointed out that the absence of objective criteria leads to the formation of councils lacking critical oversight and effectiveness, with repeated instances of collective approvals for hundreds of names without any objections, raising doubts about the integrity and impartiality of these councils. The article concludes with a call to adopt clear standards for representation and selection—such as transparency, participation, and integrity—to enhance trust in the decisions of leaders and official bodies.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)