2 Hrs
Source:
اليوم السابع
_1777352142843_145525226.png&w=64&q=75){kind=small}
Source: اليوم السابع
2 Hrsاليوم السابع
Source: اليوم السابع
2 HrsReady to play
Ready to play
The article argues that the Muslim Brotherhood’s discourse rests on a form of political paternalism, assuming that its leadership is better equipped to define the public interest. It may interpret citizens’ rejection of its project as a lack of awareness rather than as a legitimate political choice. The article notes that the Brotherhood’s experience in power in Egypt between 2012 and 2013 highlighted tensions between organizational loyalties and the responsibilities of governing a state, with the constitutional declaration issued in November 2012 among the key episodes. According to researcher Tarek al-Bishbishi, claiming an exclusive right to represent society undermines trust and deepens divisions. Citizenship entails Egyptians’ right to choose, and legitimacy must rest on law, institutions, and the will of the people.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)