Jordanian man’s restoration dispute
The Court of Civil and Criminal Settlement in Amman ruled that the doctor was not responsible for fraud regarding goods following a surgical procedure for a patient who requested compensation. It was found that the relationship was a contracting agreement for medical treatment rather than a sale contract, and what occurred resulted from a change in the type of stent used based on another doctor's consultation. The lawsuit involved the patient's claim for compensation due to side effects and pain after the stent implantation. However, the court emphasized that the law requires the existence of a sales contract and the sale of a specific product to prove fraud, which was not present in this case. Therefore, the doctor was declared innocent.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)