Discrimination: Vague terms mask intent
The Kuwaiti Court of Cassation has issued judicial rulings concerning freedom of expression and permissible criticism. It overturned acquittal rulings for several former lawmakers and activists, and sentenced them to jail terms ranging from 2 to 3 years for charges of publishing false news and rumors that could harm national interests and the country's reputation. The court emphasized that vague or elaborate expressions do not justify malicious intent when they contain a criminal purpose of spreading rumors or casting doubt on the authorities' powers. Permissible criticism, the court stated, should be limited to expressing opinions without disseminating false information. Additionally, the court decided that some of the defendants, based on their circumstances and age, are not expected to reoffend, so it chose to abstain from imposing punishment on them. Conversely, others were retried and sentenced to imprisonment. It is worth noting that these rulings concern violations related to questioning the Prince’s authority, insulting judicial officials, and disseminating false news via social media.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)