Delays in Name Stability Repeat 2005 Errors
The article discusses the challenges facing Lebanon in achieving deep, institutional reforms, particularly within the context of entrenched patronage and sectarian systems that perpetuate a system of quotas. It highlights that the current authorities continue to produce tools of the old regime rather than building a strong, independent rule of law. Appointments are often based on political quotas rather than efficiency and professionalism, especially within security and judicial institutions. This approach threatens the credibility and sovereignty of the state, especially as the influence of interest networks and the so-called "deep state" grows, hindering genuine reform and emphasizing the need for clear, transparent institutional standards. It asserts that gaining the trust of both local and international actors requires moving away from policies of appeasement and consolidating authority within institutions. Without this, the state will be unable to enforce its sovereignty, fight corruption, or ensure the independence of the judiciary and security agencies. In summary: true reform necessitates rebuilding effective, independent institutions free from quotas, rather than merely changing faces, to ensure Lebanon's sovereignty and stability.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)