_1777011671128_85597701.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Analysis of Constitutional Court's Law 66.23 ruling
The decision of the Constitutional Court in Morocco halted at the threshold of rejecting the legal referral concerning the constitutional conformity of Law No. 66.23 regulating the legal profession. The refusal was due to the lack of an official, final, and verified copy of the legal text approved by the Parliament. The Court emphasized that its jurisdiction in constitutional review is limited to texts that are clear and accompanied by the official final version, and not to reports or non-final drafts. Although the law was enacted by Parliament, the absence of the complete final version rendered the Court unable to carry out its review, leaving the law without prior constitutional approval and making it impossible to determine its compliance with the constitution. Additionally, the decision highlights the importance of adhering to the formal procedures outlined in law and the constitution to enable effective constitutional review. It underscores the necessity of correcting the referral file to allow the Court to complete its legal examination.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)