127 Days
Source:
تونزي تيليغراف
Source: تونزي تيليغراف
127 Daysتونزي تيليغراف
Source: تونزي تيليغراف
127 DaysReady to play
Ready to play
Judge Mohamed Elayadi considered that the decision made by the Truth and Dignity Commission’s council in 2015 gives the state two options regarding the Arbitration and Reconciliation Committee: either it becomes a tribunal with binding authority on both parties or simply an amicable body without the power to impose compensations. He emphasized that the state's choice to grant the committee binding powers is not clearly outlined in the agreement, which raises legal issues. He pointed out that the approach chosen by the government has resulted in unexpected judicial outcomes. Additionally, he noted that arbitration and reconciliation can be applied to cases of serious violations and financial corruption crimes, with differences in their legal implications.
Notice: This Is an AI-Generated Summary
Comments (0)